[Rameshkumar Sagar]

Thank you sir.

[Rameshkumar Sagar]

sir,
thank u for reply.
for your recollection of my case the brief details:
1. my son Hindu, married with Philippino citizen christian lady in 2005 at kuwait.
2. Marriage registered in the State of KUWAIT. Ministri of Justice as Marriage contract no 854 in presence of two witnesses of the Marriage both are Muslims.
3. Stated in the Certificate:: TRUE MARRIAGE VALID WITH CONSENT OF THE JUDGEAND ACCEPTANCE OF THE HUSBAND ABOVE MENTIONED ON DOWRY OF K.D 200.ACCORDINGLY TO THE BOOK OF ALLAH ..BEING AFTER CONFIRMATION ..FROM LEGAL PROHIBITION.
REMARKS: Husband bearing declaration of ISLAM Number 588 dt. 11-4-2005 so as wife no. 642 dt. 19-4-2005.
4. REPORT OF MARRIAGE: embassy of the republic of the philippines -state of kuwait.
This marriage was to day registered with the Embassy under no. KT-96-06 of the civil Registry Record Book.
SEAL OF THE EMBASSY OF PHILIPPINES -KUWAIT
PL. REPLY ME :-
A. WHETHER THIS MARRIAGE GOVERNS BY THE FOREIGN MARRIAGE ACT?
B. THE SPOUSE ID IN PHILIPPINE WITH TWO CHILDREN 10, AND 6 YERS DUG. AND SON.
C. SHE REFUSED TO RECONCILE AND SEEKS DIVORCE.
D. PETITIONS FOR DIVORCE on mental cruelty AND CHILD CUSTODY UNDER WHICH LAW?
E. Reasons for best welfare of the children are there.
awaiting reply
R.P.SAGAR

[Rameshkumar Sagar]

Thank you sir.

[Rameshkumar Sagar]

sir,
thanks for quick reply.
pl. guide me :-
1.order Dismissal of complaint u.s 138 N.I.Act passed agaist me u/s 204(4) and 256(1) Cr.p.c
2.paid process fees on the same day 19-07-11 the complaint filed by affixing court fees tickets.Then the summons issued.
3. The case posted on for service of Warrant and not for hearing or for evidence,
4. whether these two points will me in Revision?
5. i gone through the papers no prescribe paper or written
showing that plea is taken.
6. on dated 16-03-12 my advocate had given application
that due to absence of accused ”No Plea IS TAKEN”
7.Now when the accused was present in the court the Magistrate did not take plea, the accused now at large so warrant could not be served.
8. The Magistrate did not take surety to ensure presence of accused.
9. In the circumstances:-
a. process fees paid, whether sec. 204(4) apply?
b. if not the order D.D. can stands sustainable?
c. if the case is posted on for service of warrant
sec. 256(1) can apply?
d. the point of ”Plea” has any legal effect?
e. the point of not taken ”surety” can have any
effect in Revision?
f. can i be succeeded in Revision?

[Author]

Posts