Can civil and criminal proceedings be conducted simultaneously in the same matter?

Question: Is it possible to file civil and criminal proceedings in the same matter together? In my case, a particular document is forged. I need to file an FIR in respect of such forgery. At the same time, I need to file a civil suit against the opposite party to enforce my rights against the said forged document. Can I file both these proceedings together? If a chargesheet is subsequently filed in the said FIR which I intend to register now in respect of the said forgery, will the trial court proceed with the criminal proceedings at a time when simultaneous civil proceedings are being conducted in respect of the same forged document?

Answer: Yes, it is possible to simultaneously proceed with civil proceedings and criminal proceedings in the same matter, because these are proceedings of different types. The purpose and objective of conducting these proceedings are different.

In fact, in the case of Syed Askari Hadi Ali Augustine Imam v. State (Delhi Admn.), (2009) 5 SCC 528, the Supreme Court has held that:

“Indisputably, in a given case, a civil proceeding as also a criminal proceeding may proceed simultaneously. Cognizance in a criminal proceeding can be taken by the criminal court upon arriving at the satisfaction that there exists a prima facie case.”

The Supreme Court further held that the question as to whether in the facts and circumstances of the case one or the other proceedings would be stayed would depend upon several factors including the nature and the stage of the case. The court further observed that it is, however, now well settled that ordinarily a criminal proceeding will have primacy over the civil proceeding. Precedence to a criminal proceeding is given having regard to the fact that disposal of a civil proceeding ordinarily takes a long time and in the interest of justice the former should be disposed of as expeditiously as possible.

In M.S. Sheriff v. State of Madras, AIR 1954 SC 397, a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court, while dealing with a question as to whether a civil suit or a criminal case should be stayed in the event both are pending, held that the criminal matter should be given precedence. In regard to the possibility of conflict in decisions if both proceedings are held, it was held that the law envisages such an eventuality when it expressly refrains from making the decision of one court binding on the other or even relevant, except for certain limited purposes, such as sentence or damages. It was held that the only relevant consideration was the likelihood of embarrassment.

In view of these, depending upon facts and circumstances of the case, it may be possible for you to file FIR in the matter of forged document and initiate the criminal proceedings in respect of that, and at the same time to file a civil suit to protect your rights or enforce your rights against such forged document. There is no bar in the law to these two types of proceedings being held simultaneously in a given matter.

3 COMMENTS

  1. विनोद कुमार दुबे पुत्र स्वर्गीय गायत्री देवी

    महोदय,, निवेदन है कि मेरी माता जी श्रीमती गायत्री देवी व मेरे मामा द्वारा संयुक्त रूप से एक प्लाट 400बर्ग फीट रजिस्टर्ड बैनामा द्वारा 1979 में खरीदा गया था । मामा के बेटों द्वारा एक फर्जी नोटेरी 100 रुपये के स्टाम्प पेपर पर बिकृय पतृ/ रसीद दिनांक 5-1-2006 बनाकर उसमें लिखा गया की सह मालिक गायत्री देवी ने अपने हिस्से का 2000बर्ग फीट प्लाट का बिकृय 50,000/लेकर अपने भाई सियाराम मिश्रा को बेच दिया गया था ,। तदोपरांत सियाराम मिश्रा के बेटों ने इस फर्जी नोटेरी बिकृय पतृ/रसीद को आधार बनाकर सिविल कोर्ट सीनियर डिवीजन मैनपुरी में वाद प्रस्तुत किया गया कि पूरे 4000बर्ग फीट प्लाट का मालिकाना हक केवल सियाराम मिश्रा का है ।यह वाद सिविल कोर्ट में लंबित है,,मेरी माता जी को नोटिस के माध्यम एवं अन्य माध्यमों से जब पता चला कि सियाराम मिश्रा के बेटों ने उनके फर्जी हस्ताक्षर कर उपरोक्त फर्जी नोटेरी बिकृय पतृ/रसीद बनाकर वाद प्रस्तुत किया है तो मेरी माता जी ने गायत्री देवी द्वारा उनके खिलाफ पुलिस में रिपोर्ट दर्ज करवा दी गई । जिस में सियाराम मिश्रा के 5बेटों के खिलाफ पुलिस द्वारा चार्जशीट दाखिल की गई है । आरोपियों ने पुलिस जांच के समय हाई कोर्ट इलाहाबाद से अरेस्टिंग स्टे ले रखा था तथा कृमिनल केस की पृोसीडिंग शुरू होने पर हाईकोर्ट से इस आशय के साथ पृोसेडिंग स्टे लिया गया है कि इस फर्जी नोटेरी बिकृय पतृ/रसीद से संबंधित वाद सिविल कोर्ट में विचाराधीन है । महोदय जब पुलिस द्वारा फर्जी दस्तावेज बनाने व उसका दुरुपयोग सिविल कोर्ट में किये जाने के संबंध में 5 को आरोपित किया जा चुका है तो हाई कोर्ट ने कृमिनल केस की पृोसीडिंग पर स्टे क्यों लगा रखा है ,। क्या हाई कोर्ट आरोपियों को बचाने और दुबारा फर्जीफिकेशन कर धोखाधड़ी करने केलिए उत्साहित करना चाहता है ?

  2. If civil case is pending in senior division civil court, can city survey officer (Nagar bhumapan Adhikari) MAHARASHTRA has jurisdiction to intertain same by hearing and issuing notices to responant in same case ???
    OR city survey officer /Nagar bhumapan adhikari have the rights to run the case if the same case is going on in senior division civil court

  3. does civil and criminal proceeding can run simultaneously even probate on will is granted earlier. detail of bank accounts are show jointly holder of account in WILL while on witness of bank manager it was seen singly holder of the accounts facts of fraud have been seen . and probate is taken with concealing material facts even giving legal notice as only legal heir before filing the probate application which was concealed from the Honorable high court. . Will is not registered nor notarized , testatrix have signed on last page will witness have signed at all the pages of will. need your guidance.

LEAVE YOUR COMMENT

Note: 1. Your email is kept confidential and is NOT displayed. 2. All comments are moderated. 3. Do NOT use keywords or dummy names in the Name field. 4. Spam or abusive comments or comments with hyperlinks will be deleted.

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here