THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT – 2st Question

Tilak Marg Forum for Legal Questions Forums Others THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT – 2st Question

Tagged: 

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • Author
    Posts
    • #5342
      rajashekart08
      Blocked

      Sir, I have worked in a private company on contract basis for 6 months period and I didn’t asked and received work experience certificate from employer because of I felt it is not worth at that time, but unfortunately, I need certificate and same I requested to employer and employer issued certificate but he is mentioned the certificate issued date is my last working day(6 months back) in that company instead of present date, it will acceptable under evidence act?

    • #5410

      You have not clarified as to why do you want to know about the admissibility / acceptability of the work experience certificate under the Evidence Act. From your question, it appears that you need this certificate for getting some fresh contract or work from some other company. If that is the case, the new employer will not ask you to prove the experience certificate under the Evidence Act. And, you have mentioned as to whether some litigation is going on with regard to that experience certificate.

      In any case, if the company had prepared the certificate at an earlier time but given you now, it would be accepted under the Evidence Act even if it is a subject matter of some litigation.

           


      Dr. Ashok Dhamija is a New Delhi based Supreme Court Advocate and author of law books. Read more about him by clicking here. List of his Forum Replies. List of his other articles. List of his Quora Answers. List of his YouTube Videos.

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • The forum ‘Others’ is closed to new Questions and replies.

You may also like to read these topics:

What can be done and what cannot be in a cross-examination?
Can a mobile phone screenshot be accepted as legal evidence in a case in India?
No call details record of complainant in the FIR/ charge sheet
Is certified copy taken itself from photocopy admissible as secondary evidence?