Section 34 (3) of arbitration and conciliation act

Tilak Marg Forum for Legal Questions Forums Arbitration Section 34 (3) of arbitration and conciliation act

This topic contains 1 reply, has 2 voices, and was last updated by Dr. Ashok Dhamija Dr. Ashok Dhamija 2 months, 3 weeks ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #5376

    l k
    Guest

    Sir,

    Limitation for filing section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act starts from the date of disposal of section 33 application. My question is whether such limitation is applicable to both the parties or only to the party who filed section 33 application before the arbitrator. Please enlighten us.

    Thanks
    Lokesh

  • #5411

    Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is as under:

    “(3) An application for setting aside may not be made after three months have elapsed from the date on which the party making that application had received the arbitral award or, if a request had been made under Section 33, from the date on which that request had been disposed of by the arbitral tribunal:

    Provided that if the Court is satisfied that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause from making the application within the said period of three months it may entertain the application within a further period of thirty days, but not thereafter.”

    Therefore, it appears that the language of the provision is neutral (and silent), and it does not refer to any specific party which made the request under Section 33 of the Act.

    For example, suppose one party had made request under Section 33 for correction in award and the other party was given notice (as required under that section) of this request, then naturally, the other party may also wait for the decision of the arbitral tribunal under that section.

    In my opinion, this limitation provision should be applicable to both parties because pendency of a request under Section 33 of the Act means that the proceedings are still going on and the award may be corrected or interpreted, as the case may be, by the arbitral tribunal.

         


    Dr. Ashok Dhamija is a New Delhi based Supreme Court Advocate and author of law books. Read more about him by clicking here. List of his Forum Replies. List of his other articles. List of his Quora Answers. List of his YouTube Videos.

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Facebook Comments

[Note: For a free legal question with your Facebook login, click here.]