Jurisdiction of court to set aside arbitration award

Tilak Marg Forum for Legal Questions Forums Arbitration Jurisdiction of court to set aside arbitration award

Tagged: 

This topic contains 1 reply, has 2 voices, and was last updated by Dr. Ashok Dhamija Dr. Ashok Dhamija 9 months, 3 weeks ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #3743

    Sir,

    An arbitration award has been passed against me without affording opportunity to me. I want to get the award set aside but don’t know which court shall have the jurisdiction to set aside the award. The company main office is at Mumbai and I am residing in bihar. Please help sir
    Thank yoi

  • #3745

    The grounds on which an arbitration award may be set aside are laid down in sub-sections (2) and (2-A) of Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as under:

    “(2) An arbitral award may be set aside by the Court only if—

    (a) the party making the application furnishes proof that—

    (i) a party was under some incapacity; or

    (ii) The arbitration agreement is not valid under the law to which the parties have subjected it or, failing any indication thereon, under the law for the time being in force; or

    (iii) the party making the application was not given proper notice of the appointment of an arbitrator or of the arbitral proceedings or was otherwise unable to present his case; or

    (iv) the arbitral award deals with a dispute not contemplated by or not falling within the terms of the submission to arbitration, or it contains decisions on matters beyond the scope of the submission to arbitration:

    Provided that, if the decisions on matters submitted to arbitration can be separated from those not so submitted, only that part of the arbitral award which contains decisions on matters not submitted to arbitration may be set aside; or

    (v) the composition of the arbitral tribunal or the arbitral procedure was not in accordance with the agreement of the parties, unless such agreement was in conflict with a provision of this Part from which the parties cannot derogate, or, failing such agreement, was not in accordance with this Part; or

    (b) the Court finds that—

    (i) the subject-matter of the dispute is not capable of settlement by arbitration under the law for the time being in force, or

    (ii) the arbitral award is in conflict with the public policy of India.

    Explanation 1.— For the avoidance of any doubt, it is clarified that an award is in conflict with the public policy of India, only if,—

    (i) the making of the award was induced or affected by fraud or corruption or was in violation of Section 75 or Section 81; or

    (ii) it is in contravention with the fundamental policy of Indian law; or

    (iii) it is in conflict with the most basic notions of morality or justice.

    Explanation 2.— For the avoidance of doubt, the test as to whether there is a contravention with the fundamental policy of Indian law shall not entail a review on the merits of the dispute.

    (2-A) An arbitral award arising out of arbitrations other than international commercial arbitrations, may also be set aside by the Court, if the Court finds that the award is vitiated by patent illegality appearing on the face of the award:

    Provided that an award shall not be set aside merely on the ground of an erroneous application of the law or by reappreciation of evidence.”

    The Court which has jurisdiction in this regard (for an arbitration other than international commercial arbitration) is as laid down in Section 2(e)(i) of the said Act:

    “(e) “Court” means—

    (i) in the case of an arbitration other than international commercial arbitration, the principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction in a district, and includes the High Court in exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction, having jurisdiction to decide the questions forming the subject-matter of the arbitration if the same had been the subject-matter of a suit, but does not include any Civil Court of a grade inferior to such principal Civil Court, or any Court of Small Causes;”

     

         


    Dr. Ashok Dhamija is a New Delhi based Supreme Court Advocate and author of law books. Read more about him by clicking here. List of his Forum Replies. List of his other articles. List of his Quora Answers.

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

You may also like to read these topics:

Cheque bounce jurisdiction issue when cheque is bounced at a third place?
Dismissal from service - territorial jurisdiction of CAT Bench
Question on jurisdiction of Trial Court
What is jurisdiction of ACB office to book a case

Facebook Comments