FORGED DOCUMENTS IN CIVIL COURT

Tilak Marg Forum for Legal Questions Forums Criminal Law FORGED DOCUMENTS IN CIVIL COURT

Viewing 3 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #534

      sir,
      what is the procedure to file the complaint, if one party fileD forged documents and also given false evidence in the civil court

      1.civil court has got right to register the case?
      2.to give the direction to the concerned police station to register the case and investigate the matter?
      3.file the complaint before criminal court U/s 200 Cr.P.c after getting the certified copies from civil court
      which one is the right choice? what is the procedure?
      plz tell me sir,
      Regards,
      KS REDDY

    • #539

      Answer:
      You can file an application before the court for initiating action in this regard. Thereafter, the court has to follow the procedure laid down in Section 340 of the Cr.P.C., which is reproduced as under:

      340. Procedure in cases mentioned in Section 195.—(1) When, upon an application made to it in this behalf or otherwise, any Court is of opinion that it is expedient in the interests of justice that an inquiry should be made into any offence referred to in clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 195, which appears to have been committed in or in relation to a proceeding in that Court or, as the case may be, in respect of a document produced or given in evidence in a proceeding in that Court, such Court may, after such preliminary inquiry, if any, as it thinks necessary,—
      (a) record a finding to that effect;
      (b) make a complaint thereof in writing;
      (c) send it to a Magistrate of the first class having jurisdiction;
      (d) take sufficient security for the appearance of the accused before such Magistrate, or if the alleged offence is non-bailable and the Court thinks it necessary so to do, send the accused in custody to such Magistrate; and
      (e) bind over any person to appear and give evidence before such Magistrate.
      (2) The power conferred on a Court by sub-section (1) in respect of an offence may, in any case where that Court has neither made a complaint under sub-section (1) in respect of that offence nor rejected an application for the making of such complaint, be exercised by the Court to which such former Court is subordinate within the meaning of sub-section (4) of Section 195.
      (3) A complaint made under this section shall be signed,—
      (a) where the Court making the complaint is a High Court, by such officer of the Court as the Court may appoint;
      (b) in any other case, by the presiding officer of the Court 1[or by such officer of the Court as the Court may authorise in writing in this behalf.]
      (4) In this section, “Court” has the same meaning as in Section 195.”

      Section 195 Cr.P.C., which is referred to in the above section, is also reproduced below:

      195. Prosecution for contempt of lawful authority of public servants, for offences against public justice and for offences relating to documents given in evidence.—(1) No Court shall take cognizance—
      (a) (i) of any offence punishable under Sections 172 to 188 (both inclusive) of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), or
      (ii) of any abetment of, or attempt to commit, such offence, or
      (iii) of any criminal conspiracy to commit such offence,
      except on the complaint in writing of the public servant concerned or of some other public servant to whom he is administratively subordinate;
      (b) (i) of any offence punishable under any of the following sections of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), namely, Sections 193 to 196 (both inclusive), 199, 200, 205 to 211 (both inclusive) and 228, when such offence is alleged to have been committed in, or in relation to, any proceeding in any Court, or
      (ii) of any offence described in Section 463, or punishable under Section 471, Section 475 or Section 476, of the said Code, when such offence is alleged to have been committed in respect of a document produced or given in evidence in a proceeding in any Court, or
      (iii) of any criminal conspiracy to commit, or attempt to commit, or the abetment of, any offence specified in sub-clause (i) or sub-clause (ii),
      except on the complaint in writing of that Court or by such officer of the Court as that Court may authorise in writing in this behalf, or of some other Court to which that Court is subordinate.
      (2) Where a complaint has been made by a public servant under clause (a) of sub-section (1) any authority to which he is administratively subordinate may order the withdrawal of the complaint and send a copy of such order to the Court; and upon its receipt by the Court, no further proceedings shall be taken on the complaint:
      Provided that no such withdrawal shall be ordered if the trial in the Court of first instance has been concluded.
      (3) In clause (b) of sub-section (1), the term “Court” means a Civil, Revenue or Criminal Court, and includes a tribunal constituted by or under a Central, Provincial or State Act, if declared by that Act to be a Court for the purposes of this section.
      (4) For the purposes of clause (b) of sub-section (1), a Court shall be deemed to be subordinate to the Court to which appeals ordinarily lie from the appealable decrees or sentences of such former Court, or in the case of a Civil Court from whose decrees no appeal ordinarily lies, to the principal Court having ordinary original civil jurisdiction within whose local jurisdiction such Civil Court is situate:
      Provided that—
      (a) where appeals lie to more than one Court, the Appellate Court of inferior jurisdiction shall be the Court to which such Court shall be deemed to be subordinate;
      (b) where appeals lie to a Civil and also to a Revenue Court, such Court shall be deemed to be subordinate to the Civil or Revenue Court according to the nature of the case or proceeding in connection with which the offence is alleged to have been committed.”

           


      Dr. Ashok Dhamija is a New Delhi based Supreme Court Advocate and author of law books. Read more about him by clicking here. List of his Forum Replies. List of his other articles. List of his Quora Answers. List of his YouTube Videos.

    • #543

      how to invoke sections 340 & 195 of Cr.P.C in civil proceedings in the civil matter ?
      application filed under 151 of CPC or section 340 of Cr.P.C?

    • #546

      Please read the sections carefully. Answer should be obvious. Section 195(3) states that “In clause (b) of sub-section (1), the term “Court” means a Civil, Revenue or Criminal Court, and includes a tribunal …”.

      And, Section 340(4) says that “In this section, “Court” has the same meaning as in Section 195”.

      Therefore, for the purposes of Section 340, power is given to the civil court also.     


      Dr. Ashok Dhamija is a New Delhi based Supreme Court Advocate and author of law books. Read more about him by clicking here. List of his Forum Replies. List of his other articles. List of his Quora Answers. List of his YouTube Videos.

Viewing 3 reply threads
  • The Question ‘FORGED DOCUMENTS IN CIVIL COURT’ is closed to new replies.