Withdrawal of false complaint made under section 7 of the PC Act.

Tilak Marg Forum for Legal Questions Forums Criminal Law Withdrawal of false complaint made under section 7 of the PC Act.

Tagged: 

Viewing 3 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #3406

      An FIR was filed against the accused under section 7 and 13(1)(d) of the PC act.The Final Investigation Report has been submitted by the Investigation agency in the Trial Court.The Trail Court has not taken the cognizance of the case even after lapse of more than one year.The complaint was made with malafide intention in connivance with the Police. Now if the Complainant after realising his mistake wants to withdraw his complaint:
      1.Is it possible for the complainant to withdraw his complaint at this stage.
      2.If yes, what is the legal procedure to withdraw the complaint. Will the complainant be liable for punishment for making a false complaint.
      3.If no,then what is the other legal remedy available.

    • #3408

      It is not possible for the complainant to withdraw a case under Section 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and more so, when such case has already been charge sheeted. These offences are not compoundable and cannot be compromised by the parties.

      Quashing of the proceedings in these offences may not be permissible even by the High Court as per the guidelines laid down in the case of Gian Singh  v.  State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303 : AIR 2012 SC Supp 838 : 2012 Cri LJ 4934.

      You may try to file a discharge application in the trial court, on the basis of an affidavit of the complainant (if he makes it) supporting your case. But, here also, there is no guarantee that the trial court will permit it, and sometimes (depending on facts) there may be a risk that perjury proceedings may be initiated against the complainant himself.

      The only option that would be left open would be that during the trial, the complainant retracts his previous statement and turns hostile. But, remember, technically it is possible to convict the accused person even on the basis of the evidence of other witnesses, in particular the evidence of the shadow witness (the panch witness who accompanied the complainant during trap and witnessed the bribe demand and acceptance).

           


      Dr. Ashok Dhamija is a New Delhi based Supreme Court Advocate and author of law books. Read more about him by clicking here. List of his Forum Replies. List of his other articles. List of his Quora Answers. List of his YouTube Videos.

    • #3423

      Respected Sir,

      Thanks for the prompt and valuable advice .

      In the present case ,as per the charge sheet filed by the Investigating agency , inspite of the presence of two panch witnesses none of them or any members of the trap team witnessed the alleged demand and acceptance of illegal gratification .

      The Panch witnesses have only witnessed the pre-trap and the trap proceedings without witnessing the alleged demand and acceptance .The alleged criminal misconduct has not been witnessed by any one except the false and malafide statement of the complainant.

      In such a situation what is the legal remedy available to the accused.

      In the above circumstances,if the accused files a discharge application and the trial court does not accept it ;What shall be the disadvantage to the accused in the future trial.

    • #3425

      I think I have already replied. What you have mentioned is the details of evidence. But, the basic principle remains the same.

      If the discharge application is rejected, it does not affect the subsequent trial in which evidence has to be led in detail and the case has to be proved on the basis of such evidence.     


      Dr. Ashok Dhamija is a New Delhi based Supreme Court Advocate and author of law books. Read more about him by clicking here. List of his Forum Replies. List of his other articles. List of his Quora Answers. List of his YouTube Videos.

Viewing 3 reply threads
  • The forum ‘Criminal Law’ is closed to new Questions and replies.

You may also like to read these topics:

FIR, charge, sanction under S. 13(1)(d) of PC Act but conviction under 13(1)(c)
Taking household expenses at one-third of income in disproportionate assets case
Section of Prevention of Corruption Act to book person giving bribe to employee?
Can Prevention of Corruption Act case be filed against retired public servant?