It is further to add that before suspension file was sent to vig, deptt. DOV & CS Delhi both denied my suspension. But the CFS made noting on file that fso admitted his fault of paying less money to vendor at her own and requested to reconsider his opinion of suspension. The CS then reviewed his order and made me suspended. The article of charges donot exist as the vendor has issued signed bill and supporting legal documents on the bases of which convictions are there upto Supreme Court. My promotion has been sealed and she her selves becomes dis.auth. And witness also. This is really surprising?
