Sir ,
ππππ
Thank you for the quick response on the conditions under which the chequeβs Signature issued would be verified by the court . Thank you for explaining the same in length.
My question to you here is whether under a stop payment of the cheque by the drawer , with the verification that the funds where insufficient , will his reason for the stop payment ( signature mismatch ) have any challenge to try the case under 139 where the Supreme Court has given direction in the electronic trading case that once the drawer issues the order for stop payment and he has not paid after the notice period , itβs the burden on the drawer to prove his innocence on the legal liability.
And in the process of defence can he ask for forensic of the cheque or the judge will look at all the evidence the complainant has provided to prove the liability.
Thank you for your quick response ππ