Supreme court direction for early settlement by Accused in NI 138

Tilak Marg Forum for Legal Questions Forums Criminal Law Supreme court direction for early settlement by Accused in NI 138

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #3806

      Respected sir
      In accordance with M/S Meters And Instruments … vs Kanchan Mehta on 5 October, 2017 I understand that accused can pay the cheque amount, interest and legal charges and prey the justice for compounding even without the consent from the complaintant. Kindly let me know if this is correct
      regards

    • #3807

      In the case of M/s. Meters and Instruments Private Limited v. Kanchan Mehta, decided on 5th October, 2017, the relevant observations of the Supreme Court are as under:

      “In view of the above, we hold that where the cheque amount with interest and cost as assessed by the Court is paid by a specified date, the Court is entitled to close the proceedings in exercise of its powers under Section 143 of the Act read with Section 258 Cr.P.C.”

      “In every complaint under Section 138 of the Act, it may be desirable that the complainant gives his bank account number and if possible e-mail ID of the accused. If e-mail ID is available with the Bank where the accused has an account, such Bank, on being required, should furnish such e-mail ID to the payee of the cheque. In every summons, issued to the accused, it may be indicated that if the accused deposits the specified amount, which should be assessed by the Court having regard to the cheque amount and interest/cost, by a specified date, the accused need not appear unless required and proceedings may be closed subject to any valid objection of the complainant. If the accused complies with such summons and informs the Court and the complainant by e-mail, the Court can ascertain the objection, if any, of the complainant and close the proceedings unless it becomes necessary to proceed with the case. In such a situation, the accused’s presence can be required, unless the presence is otherwise exempted subject to such conditions as may be considered appropriate. The accused, who wants to contest the case, must be required to disclose specific defence for such contest. It is open to the Court to ask specific questions to the accused at that stage. In case the trial is to proceed, it will be open to the Court to explore the possibility of settlement. It will also be open to the Court to consider the provisions of plea bargaining. Subject to this, the trial can be on day to day basis and endeavour must be to conclude it within six months. The guilty must be punished at the earliest as per law and the one who obeys the law need not be held up in proceedings for long unnecessarily.”

      Therefore, what is required is that the court has to assess the interest and cost and to inform the accused to make the payment of these amounts along with the cheque amount by a specified date. And, if such payment is made by the accused, the court may close the case after considering valid objections of the complainant, if any. It is clear that if the complainant objects to this course of action, the court has the power either to close the case or continue with the trial.

      If, in your case, if the court has not given any such direction on its own, you can file an application in terms of the above and request the court to take action in this regard.

           


      Dr. Ashok Dhamija is a New Delhi based Supreme Court Advocate and author of law books. Read more about him by clicking here. List of his Forum Replies. List of his other articles. List of his Quora Answers. List of his YouTube Videos.

    • #3840

      Hi Sir
      thank you for your reply. What are the possible valid objections of the complaintant
      regards

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • The forum ‘Criminal Law’ is closed to new Questions and replies.

You may also like to read these topics:

Dishonor of cheque for which the liability is cleared by other payment mode
Cheque bounce case under 138 NI act - Interim Relief of 20%
The drawer has given stop payment and also is denying the signature on the check
What are the stages of trial of a case U/s 138 of NI Act?