Erode Sp Did not action under IPC 387.

Tilak Marg Forum for Legal Questions Forums Criminal Law Erode Sp Did not action under IPC 387.

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • Author
    Posts
    • #5241

      I am a Petitioner.
      Taluk Police Station filed fir under IPC 387 non bailable offence in the year 3.3.2017.
      Sp didn’t action against IPC 387 non bailable offence.
      What is the Immediate Remedy.

    • #5245

      Please do not ask repeated and vague / irrelevant questions on same or similar issues. This may compel us to block the user.

      It is not possible to comprehend your question. When the police station has registered the FIR, how is SP supposed to deal with that? It is the duty of the police station to investigate the case and take it to logical conclusion. It the police station failed to do so, and if you complained to the SP, then you should have mentioned that.

      What do you mean by “didn’t action against IPC 387 non bailable offence”? It was not chargesheeted or the accused was not arrested or what?

      Any way, if police fails to take action in an investigation such as not charge-sheeting, you may file a protest petition in the Magistrate court after filing of final report by police. Otherwise, you can approach the high court under Section 482 Cr.P.C.     


      Dr. Ashok Dhamija is a New Delhi based Supreme Court Advocate and author of law books. Read more about him by clicking here. List of his Forum Replies. List of his other articles. List of his Quora Answers. List of his YouTube Videos.

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • The Question ‘Erode Sp Did not action under IPC 387.’ is closed to new replies.

You may also like to read these topics:

Improper investigation u/s 156(3) by police and judge dismissing the application
Who takes cognizance of a non-cognizable offence in a rural village or town?
How to compromise a case of assault on police (353) and non-obedience of order?
How can I obtain copies of Case Diary from police of investigation done in FIR?