Recalling the complainant for further examination during trial

Tilak Marg Forum for Legal Questions Forums Criminal Law Recalling the complainant for further examination during trial

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • Author
    Posts
    • #3852
      Anonymous
      Guest

      In a private complaint case filed against me as accused, the complainant has already been examined and certain documents were produced by him. Subsequently, 3 other witnesses were examined from the complainant side. Now, an applicant has been made by the complainant for recalling the complainant for his examination again to lead further evidence. The Magistrate has allowed his examination and has fixed date for further examination in the next month. This was done despite my objection. Is it permissible under law? Can the complainant be recalled for his further examination during trial?

    • #3859

      The court has the power under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code to recall a witness for his examination at any stage of the trial:

      311. Power to summon material witness, or examine person present.— Any Court may, at any stage of any inquiry, trial or other proceeding under this Code, summon any person as a witness, or examine any person in attendance, though not summoned as a witness, or recall and re-examine any person already examined; and the Court shall summon and examine or recall and re-examine any such person if his evidence appears to it to be essential to the just decision of the case.”

      This section clearly shows that the court has a vast power to recall and re-examine a witness during the course of a trial under the Criminal Procedure Code. Of course, it goes without saying that “witness” also includes the “complainant”.

      However, as I have pointed out in Power of court to recall and re-examine a witness in trial under Section 311 Cr.P.C., the power of the court to recall and re-examine a witness during a trial is quite wide, but this power is not to be exercised for filling up the lacunae in the prosecution case. Such witness should be recalled, if it is necessary, for a just decision of the case or to determine the truth.

      If you feel that the complainant is being recalled to fill up the lacunae in the prosecution case, you may object to the same and if it is important for your case, you may challenge the decision of the trial court for recall of the complainant in the higher courts.

           


      Dr. Ashok Dhamija is a New Delhi based Supreme Court Advocate and author of law books. Read more about him by clicking here. List of his Forum Replies. List of his other articles. List of his Quora Answers. List of his YouTube Videos.

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • The forum ‘Criminal Law’ is closed to new Questions and replies.

You may also like to read these topics:

Improper investigation u/s 156(3) by police and judge dismissing the application
Who takes cognizance of a non-cognizable offence in a rural village or town?
How to compromise a case of assault on police (353) and non-obedience of order?
How can I obtain copies of Case Diary from police of investigation done in FIR?