Wife making false statement of not working in her maintenance case in court

Tilak Marg Forum for Legal Questions Forums Family Law Wife making false statement of not working in her maintenance case in court

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • Author
    Posts
    • #608
      Anonymous
      Guest

      My wife has filed a case against me for claiming maintenance for herself. I have got a notice of her application filed in the case. In her application she has clearly mentioned that she is not working anywhere and also that she does not have any source of income. But I know for sure that she is working in a company and she is getting salary every month. I can even get a copy of her salary certificate. What should I do? Can some action be taken against her for giving a false statement before the court?

    • #620

      Giving false evidence in a court is an offence under Section 191 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). It is the offence of perjury. Likewise, fabricating false evidence for producing it in a court is an offence under Section 192 of the IPC. Both these offences are punishable under Section 193 of IPC. These sections are reproduced below. You can file a complaint before the court where such false evidence has been produced for taking necessary action in accordance with law. [Note: Please also read this article which is similar to your question: Forged Documents In Civil Court.]

      Sections 191, 192 and 193 of IPC are reproduced below:

      191. Giving false evidence.—Whoever, being legally bound by an oath or by an express provision of law to state the truth, or being bound by law to make a declaration upon any subject, makes any statement which is false, and which he either knows or believes to be false or does not believe to be true, is said to give false evidence.

      Explanation 1.—A statement is within the meaning of this section, whether it is made verbally or otherwise.

      Explanation 2.—A false statement as to the belief of the person attesting is within the meaning of this section, and a person may be guilty of giving false evidence by stating that he believes a thing which he does not believe, as well as by stating that he knows a thing which he does not know.

      192. Fabricating false evidence.—Whoever causes any circumstance to exist or makes any false entry in any book or record, or electronic record or makes any document or electronic record containing a false statement, intending that such circumstance, false entry or false statement may appear in evidence in a judicial proceeding, or in a proceeding taken by law before a public servant as such, or before an arbitrator, and that such circumstance, false entry or false statement, so appearing in evidence, may cause any person who in such proceeding is to form an opinion upon the evidence, to entertain an erroneous opinion touching any point material to the result of such proceeding, is said “to fabricate false evidence”.

      Illustrations

      (aA puts jewels into a box belonging to Z, with the intention that they may be found in that box, and that this circumstance may cause Z to be convicted of theft. A has fabricated false evidence.

      (bA makes a false entry in his shop-book for the purpose of using it as corroborative evidence in a Court of Justice. A has fabricated false evidence.

      (cA, with the intention of causing Z to be convicted of a criminal conspiracy, writes a letter in imitation of Z‘s handwriting, purporting to be addressed to an accomplice in such criminal conspiracy, and puts the letter in a place which he knows that the officers of the police are likely to search. A has fabricated false evidence.

      193. Punishment for false evidence.—Whoever intentionally gives false evidence in any stage of a judicial proceeding, or fabricates false evidence for the purpose of being used in any stage of a judicial proceeding, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine;

      and whoever intentionally gives or fabricates false evidence in any other case, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, and shall also be liable to fine.

      Explanation 1.—A trial before a Court-martial is a judicial proceeding.

      Explanation 2.—An investigation directed by law preliminary to a proceeding before a Court of Justice, is a stage of judicial proceeding, though that investigation may not take place before a Court of Justice.

      Illustration

      A, in an enquiry before a Magistrate for the purpose of ascertaining whether Z ought to be committed for trial, makes on oath a statement which he knows to be false. As this enquiry is a stage of a judicial proceeding, A has given false evidence.

      Explanation 3.—An investigation directed by a Court of Justice according to law, and conducted under the authority of a Court of Justice, is a stage of a judicial proceeding, though that investigation may not take place before a Court of Justice.

      Illustration

      A, in an enquiry before an officer deputed by a Court of Justice to ascertain on the spot the boundaries of land, makes on oath a statement which he knows to be false. As this enquiry is a stage of a judicial proceeding, A has given false evidence.”

           


      Dr. Ashok Dhamija is a New Delhi based Supreme Court Advocate and author of law books. Read more about him by clicking here. List of his Forum Replies. List of his other articles. List of his Quora Answers. List of his YouTube Videos.

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • The forum ‘Family Law’ is closed to new Questions and replies.