Limitation period to file cheque bounce case u/S 138 Negotiable Instruments Act

Tilak Marg Forum for Legal Questions Forums Criminal Law Limitation period to file cheque bounce case u/S 138 Negotiable Instruments Act

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • Author
    Posts
    • #731
      Anonymous
      Guest

      What is the maximum period during a cheque bouncing case can be filed in the court under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act? Can this limitation period under the N.I. Act be extended if there is some genuine reasons for delay?

    • #732

      As per the provisions of Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a complaint can be made about the offence of cheque bounce under Section 138 of the Act, within one month of the expiry of 15 days period from receipt of the notice by the drawer of the cheque if no payment is made within those 15 days. However, the court has the power to condone the delay if the complainant satisfies the court that he had sufficient cause for not making a complaint within such period.

      Relevant extract of the Section 142 is reproduced below:

      142. Cognizance of offences.— (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974),—

      ***   ***   ***

      (b) such complaint is made within one month of the date on which the cause of action arises under clause (c) of the proviso to Section 138:

      Provided that the cognizance of a complaint may be taken by the court after the prescribed period, if the complainant satisfies the court that he had sufficient cause for not making a complaint within such period.”

      Provisions of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act are also reproduced below for reference:

      138. Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency, etc., of funds in the account.— Where any cheque drawn by a person on an account maintained by him with a banker for payment of any amount of money to another person from out of that account for the discharge, in whole or in part, of any debt or other liability, is returned by the bank unpaid, either because of the amount of money standing to the credit of that account is insufficient to honour the cheque or that it exceeds the amount arranged to be paid from that account by an agreement made with that bank, such person shall be deemed to have committed an offence and shall, without prejudice to any other provision of this Act, be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two year, or with fine which may extend to twice the amount of the cheque, or with both:

      Provided that nothing contained in this section shall apply unless—

      (a) the cheque has been presented to the bank within a period of six months from the date on which it is drawn or within the period of its validity, whichever is earlier;

      (b) the payee or the holder in due course of the cheque, as the case may be, makes a demand for the payment of the said amount of money by giving a notice in writing, to the drawer of the cheque, within thirty days of the receipt of information by him from the bank regarding the return of the cheque as unpaid; and

      (c) the drawer of such cheque fails to make the payment of the said amount of money to the payee or as the case may be, to the holder in due course of the cheque within fifteen days of the receipt of the said notice.

      Explanation.—For the purposes of this section, “debt or other liability” means a legally enforceable debt or other liability.”

           


      Dr. Ashok Dhamija is a New Delhi based Supreme Court Advocate and author of law books. Read more about him by clicking here. List of his Forum Replies. List of his other articles. List of his Quora Answers. List of his YouTube Videos.

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • The forum ‘Criminal Law’ is closed to new Questions and replies.